The Return of the Very Cruel Economic System

This chapter is divided into three sections.  The first section examines the origins of the neoliberal policy consensus at the OECD.  The fist major rupture in the hegemony of the Keynesianism (neoclassical synthesis MKI) at the OECD came with the publication of the McCracken Report in 1977.  Some left critics have come to regard the Report as the first truly neoliberal policy document sponsored by the OECD.  I intend to challenge this interpretation somewhat by arguing that the Report is better understood as a rupture in the Keynesian consensus and not necessarily a fully worked-out alternative and certainly not evidence of a coherent neoliberal paradigm.  The second section, attempts to clarify the relationship between monetarism and neoliberalism.  After a brief theoretical presentation, I will then examine the conference proceedings from the 1978 Boston Federal Reserve’s After The Phillips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment conference.  This conference is interesting because within its proceedings it is apparent the degree to which Keynesians like Robert Solow and Barry Bosworth (more so) were beginning to cross over from the demand to the supply side.    The third section examines the OECD Jobs Study released in 1994.  I argue that the publication of this document signals the hegemony of the neoliberal policy consensus.

The rest can be read here

Posted in Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Trying to get burned at the stake: heretical Easter edition

Me, I like heretics.  Sure hanging out with heretics and being a heretic is fraught with danger: a certain tendency towards a merely reactionary or contrarian stance, a pension for wasting time by reinventing the wheel and merely convincing yourself that a perfectly round shape really is the optimum form.  But often there is something to be learned from reverse engineering models and propositions.  Many economists like to argue that workers and consumers ultimately pay for corporate taxes either in lower wages and higher prices or both.

read the rest here

Posted in Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Hubris leads to incompetence: the Rowe & Krugman edition

Well a strange lull has fallen on the battle field this evening as the respective sides dig in and at least one side licks its wounds. 

To keep reading click here

Posted in Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Hubris leads to incompetence: the Rowe & Krugman edition

Well a strange lull has fallen on the battle field this evening as the respective sides dig in and at least one side licks its wounds. 

To keep reading click here

Posted in Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

The case for taxing the family garden

Economists frequently argue that taxing the produce from the family garden is a good idea – for example, see these papers/posts making the case for taxing food in the USCanada, and New Zealand.

read the rest here.

Posted in Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Discredited economics and the revered economist

In the wake of the financial crisis of 2007-2008 there was much talk from within and without the economics profession about what went wrong.  Many on the outside of the profession viewed the crisis as the result of the slavish devotion of policy makers to the advice of academic and private sector economists.  The outsiders continue to be astonished that economists are taken seriously any more.

The rest of this post is here.

Posted in Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

I can’t spell: the phonetic problem with homonyms

I can’t, and it has gotten worse.  Sure I used to get my i’s and e’s backwards frequently but the difference between there and their or lose and loose almost never.  It is now a pathological subterfuge on my part.  I can only beg my readers’ forgiveness.  Technically, though, I don’t think I am having spelling problems because I am spelling the wrong word correctly.  Something deeper has gotten fried.  I wonder if it is the French language training and immersion.  Perhaps it is a deep reversion to phonetics.

Thanks for the comment on the last post.

Posted in Canadian Politics | 2 Comments

Mulcair Wins. Who Loses?

It is official the NDP now has a former Liberal as the head of their party.  Not so bad.  The Liberals have a former dipper as the head of their party.  I think the loser in all of this is … Continue reading

Gallery | 3 Comments

The ubiquitous economist, the media, and Plato

It is odd.  No other discipline in the social science gets away with being considered by the media as a jack of all trades as the economist does.  Think about it.  If you go to a neurosurgeon with a question … Continue reading

Gallery | Leave a comment

Dutch Disease and Oil

CBC’s the Current had an excellent segment on Dutch Disease and what to do about it.  The set-up was quite good.  First they interviewed an economist about what Dutch disease actually is and to what extent it applies to Canada.  Then they interviewed my favourite gliberal economist.  His response was boilerplate: there was ‘nothing to be done’ (Lenin’s mirror).  Then the Current did something really interesting, they actually interviewed an expert.  You know, someone with the relevant training for the subject at hand and with direct and detailed experience: one of the architects of Norway’s oil sector.  Imagine that.

The interesting point he made is that revenue generated out of the resource sector (and Norwegian government generates as a percent of the total take almost more than anywhere else) and plough some of it back into productivity enhancing investment in other non-oil related sectors of the economy.  All very standard anti-staples trap theory thinking.

http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=2210373565

Posted in Canadian Politics | Leave a comment